Plan superiority studies with flexible endpoint choices. Enter assumptions, inspect totals, and compare allocation impacts. Export tables, save summaries, and visualize sample trends clearly.
| Example | Endpoint | Main Inputs | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | Means | Difference 5, SDs 12 and 12, alpha 0.025, power 0.80 | Useful for testing whether treatment mean exceeds control mean. |
| Case 2 | Proportions | Treatment 0.65, control 0.50, alpha 0.025, power 0.90 | Useful for comparing response rates or success rates. |
| Case 3 | Means | Difference 3, margin 0, ratio 2, dropout 15% | Useful when treatment enrollment is planned at twice control size. |
Core superiority signal: Signal = Expected effect - Superiority margin
Critical values: zalpha comes from the chosen alpha and sidedness. zbeta comes from the chosen power.
For two independent means:
ncontrol = ((zalpha + zbeta)² × (SDtreatment² / ratio + SDcontrol²)) / Signal²
ntreatment = ratio × ncontrol
For two independent proportions:
ncontrol = ((zalpha + zbeta)² × (ptreatment(1-ptreatment) / ratio + pcontrol(1-pcontrol))) / Signal²
ntreatment = ratio × ncontrol
Dropout adjustment: Adjusted sample = Ceiling(Base sample / (1 - dropout rate))
This page uses a normal approximation. Final protocol planning should always be reviewed with a statistician.
It estimates the number of participants needed to show treatment superiority over control for either means or proportions, using selected alpha, power, ratio, and dropout assumptions.
One-sided alpha is common for superiority studies when only improvement in one direction matters. Two-sided alpha is more conservative and tests both directions.
For standard superiority testing, enter 0. If your protocol defines a different superiority threshold, enter that value and ensure the expected effect stays above it.
Expected losses reduce analyzable data. The calculator inflates the base sample so the final completed sample still meets your target power.
Yes. Enter any positive treatment-to-control ratio. Ratios above 1 increase treatment enrollment, while ratios below 1 reduce it.
Means are for continuous outcomes such as scores or blood pressure. Proportions are for binary outcomes such as success, response, or event rates.
Higher power lowers the chance of missing a true superiority effect. That stronger assurance requires more information, so the needed sample rises.
No. It is an approximation based on standard normal theory. It is useful for planning, but formal trial design should still be verified statistically.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.