Model seismic response from distance and material inputs. Estimate velocities, wavelengths, and travel times instantly. Visualize trends, export findings, and guide practical design decisions.
The graph compares travel time growth for P, S, Rayleigh, and Love waves across distance. It updates using your submitted inputs.
These example values are approximate engineering references for quick comparison only.
| Material | Density (kg/m³) | Young’s Modulus (GPa) | Poisson’s Ratio | Typical P-Wave (m/s) | Typical S-Wave (m/s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite | 2700 | 55 | 0.25 | 6000 | 3460 |
| Sandstone | 2300 | 20 | 0.23 | 3500 | 2100 |
| Saturated Clay | 1900 | 0.15 | 0.45 | 1450 | 180 |
| Concrete | 2400 | 30 | 0.20 | 3700 | 2400 |
Love-wave speed depends on layered media behavior, so this calculator uses an adjustable factor. Reflection and transmission outputs are simplified normal-incidence engineering estimates.
It estimates P, S, Rayleigh, and Love wave behavior. Outputs include velocity, travel time, wavelength, angular frequency, attenuation, impedance, and simplified interface coefficients for preliminary engineering analysis.
Use elastic mode when material stiffness and density are known, but field wave speeds are not. The tool then derives P-wave and S-wave velocities from standard isotropic elastic relationships.
Use direct mode when measured or published P-wave and S-wave velocities already exist. This is helpful for site investigations, lab tests, borehole surveys, or previous seismic characterization reports.
Love waves depend strongly on layering, stiffness contrast, and dispersion. This page uses a controllable Love-wave factor for practical estimation, not a full layered-medium dispersion solution.
Seismic impedance combines density and velocity. Engineers use it to compare materials, estimate wave transmission at boundaries, and understand reflection strength between adjacent layers or components.
Attenuation reduces amplitude as distance and frequency increase. Higher quality factor values indicate less energy loss, so the wave retains more of its original amplitude over the same path.
No. It supports fast engineering screening and education. Final design decisions should still use site-specific investigations, governing standards, and advanced geophysical or structural analysis tools.
P waves usually travel faster because they compress and expand the medium along the direction of motion. S waves rely on shear deformation, which is generally slower in solid materials.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.