Enter temperature-fluorescence pairs to detect peak Tm values. Compare primary and secondary peaks with confidence. Fast interpretation helps confirm specificity before downstream analysis begins.
Paste two-column data in any common format. Commas, tabs, spaces, and semicolons are accepted. The first column is temperature, and the second is fluorescence.
This sample shows the first ten rows from the built-in demonstration dataset.
| Temperature (°C) | Fluorescence |
|---|---|
| 68.00 | 981.15 |
| 69.00 | 983.43 |
| 70.00 | 984.97 |
| 71.00 | 985.41 |
| 72.00 | 984.63 |
| 73.00 | 982.66 |
| 74.00 | 979.65 |
| 75.00 | 975.58 |
| 76.00 | 969.78 |
| 77.00 | 959.88 |
This calculator identifies candidate melt peaks from fluorescence-versus-temperature data. It smooths the signal, optionally baseline-corrects it, calculates the negative derivative, and ranks local maxima by strength and separation.
It is the temperature where the melt transition produces the highest negative derivative signal. In practice, that temperature often represents the main duplex dissociation point for the amplified product.
Melt analysis commonly transforms fluorescence decline into a derivative curve. The local maximum of the negative derivative makes the melt transition easier to locate than inspecting raw fluorescence alone.
Multiple peaks can suggest non-specific amplification, primer-dimers, mixed amplicons, or heteroduplex formation. Context still matters, so compare results with assay design, controls, and instrument output.
At least five unique points are required, but more points usually give more stable derivatives and clearer peak detection. Dense temperature sampling improves Tm precision and peak width estimates.
Use it when the overall fluorescence baseline shifts upward or downward and makes the derivative harder to interpret. Baseline correction can clarify peak structure without changing temperature order.
No. It is best used for quick analysis, teaching, screening, or independent review. Final biological interpretation should still consider instrument settings, controls, dye chemistry, and validation workflow.
A broad peak may reflect lower resolution, mixed products, noisy data, or gradual melting behavior. Wide peaks often reduce confidence because the melt transition is less sharply defined.
The algorithm uses whatever unit your data already follows. Keep all rows in one unit only. Peak spacing and width thresholds should match the same scale for consistent results.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.